Do you know where these comments come from? Let us know!
| FCC ID | Name | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1071811560714 | Kelsey Kistler | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718038217510 | Regina Rader | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107180229623994 | Joy Rex | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071894912374 | P Herrera | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718206369271 | Carol Tate | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107181623622446 | Lupe Rivas | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107180480104945 | Judith Manucy | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071887821572 | Rhonda Turner | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107180668825268 | Sharon Beers | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718203509669 | Nancy Leech | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718986214283 | Sheila Kurtz | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718476626211 | Robert Fladger | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718303005731 | Petra Ford | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718213557907 | Kris Erkiletian | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107180964401138 | Michael+Allen Allen | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071858857987 | Sean Sather-Wagstaff | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718164822630 | Jane Milliken | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718077188487 | Michele Paxson | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071805062138 | LYNNE SHAPIRO | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071851578624 | Eleanor Dowson | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071831850338 | dwight johnson | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071822686957 | JOYCE HAMILTON | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071844891920 | Richard Burke | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718286828317 | Irene Carlyle | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718072446086 | Peter Nemethy | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718516808136 | Michael Kramer | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718026166610 | David J MACKEY | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071840626087 | Amanda Lasher | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071892240582 | Liz Lebron | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107181644916170 | Kathleen Shenk | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071827748927 | Jan Wasserman | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071827875758 | Amy Collins | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718885828591 | Annie Bien | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071853835300 | Margaret A. Boone | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071850299703 | Eric Zeiler | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107180983914560 | John Malcolm Gaissert | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718528607767 | Laura+H Kracke | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107182839020605 | David Winter | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718210218846 | Monica Ortiz | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718107927812 | Charlene Sousie | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718269000304 | Gil Divine | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718155945622 | John Doughty | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071818163939 | Rosemarie Lorenz | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718177712754 | Nancy McKinney | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 107181904718732 | Courtney Bounds | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718149781677 | Gabrielle Kounde | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071843173048 | Rita Byrd | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 1071850530221 | Jackie Martinez | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718298987244 | Grace Demit | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |
| 10718610426589 | Russ Overy | Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open. |